The 'information search process' revisited: is the model still useful?
Resource type
            
        Authors/contributors
                    - Kuhlthau, Carol C. (Author)
 - Heinström, Jannica (Author)
 - Todd, Ross J. (Author)
 
Title
            The 'information search process' revisited: is the model still useful?
        Abstract
            Introduction. This paper examines the continued usefulness of Kuhlthau's Information Search Process as a model of information behaviour in new, technologically rich information environments. Method. A comprehensive review of research that has explored the model in various settings and a study employing qualitative and quantitative methods undertaken in the context of an inquiry project among school students (n=574). Students were interviewed at three stages of the information search process, during which nine feelings were identified and tracked. Results. Findings show individual patterns, but confirm the Information Search Process as a valid model in the changing information environment for describing information behaviour in tasks that require knowledge construction. The findings support the progression of feelings, thoughts and actions as suggested by the search process model. Conclusions. The information search process model remains useful for explaining students' information behaviour. The model was found to have value as a research tool as well as for practical application.
        Publication
            Information Research
        Volume
            13
        Issue
            4
        Pages
            45-45
        Date
            2008-12
        Journal Abbr
            Information Research
        Language
            en
        ISSN
            13681613
        Short Title
            The 'information search process' revisited
        Library Catalog
            EBSCOhost
        Citation
            Kuhlthau, C. C., Heinström, J., & Todd, R. J. (2008). The “information search process” revisited: is the model still useful? Information Research, 13(4), 45–45.
                Topic
            
            
        
                Field of study
            
            
        
                Contribution
            
            
        Link to this record