@article{bates_design_1989, title = {The design of browsing and berrypicking techniques for the online search interface}, volume = {13}, issn = {0309-314X}, url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/eb024320}, abstract = {First, a new model of searching in online and other information systems, called ‘berrypicking’, is discussed. This model, it is argued, is much closer to the real behavior of information searchers than the traditional model of information retrieval is, and, consequently, will guide our thinking better in the design of effective interfaces. Second, the research literature of manual information seeking behavior is drawn on for suggestions of capabilities that users might like to have in online systems. Third, based on the new model and the research on information seeking, suggestions are made for how new search capabilities could be incorporated into the design of search interfaces. Particular attention is given to the nature and types of browsing that can be facilitated.}, language = {en}, number = {5}, urldate = {2017-04-06}, journal = {Online Review}, author = {Bates, Marcia J.}, month = may, year = {1989}, pages = {407--424}, } @article{ingwersen_ranganathan_1992, title = {Ranganathan in the {Perspective} of {Advanced} {Information} {Retrieval}}, volume = {42}, issn = {0024-2667}, url = {https://search.proquest.com/docview/1304366227?pq-origsite=gscholar}, language = {en}, number = {3}, urldate = {2018-03-20}, journal = {Libri}, author = {Ingwersen, Peter and Wormell, Irene}, year = {1992}, } @article{kuhlthau_principle_1993, title = {A principle of uncertainty for information seeking}, volume = {49}, issn = {0022-0418}, url = {http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/abs/10.1108/eb026918}, doi = {10.1108/eb026918}, language = {en}, number = {4}, urldate = {2017-04-06}, journal = {Journal of Documentation}, author = {Kuhlthau, Carol C.}, month = apr, year = {1993}, pages = {339--355}, } @article{kuhlthau_inside_1991, title = {Inside the {Search} {Process}: {Information} {Seeking} from the {User}'s {Perspective}}, volume = {42}, issn = {0002-8231}, url = {http://search.proquest.com/docview/1301244250/citation/2FBBEAD901A4984PQ/1}, language = {en}, number = {5}, urldate = {2017-04-06}, journal = {Journal of the American Society for Information Science}, author = {Kuhlthau, Carol C.}, year = {1991}, } @article{maniez_classifications_1999, title = {Des classifications aux thésaurus : du bon usage des facettes}, volume = {36}, issn = {0012-4508}, shorttitle = {Des classifications aux thesaurus}, abstract = {L'usage du terme facette est bien intégré au vocabulaire de la science de l'information, mais les acceptions du mot sont si variables selon les auteurs que la perception de son contenu en devient problématique. L'A. montre ici que ces difficultés remontent au fondateur de la théorie des facettes, Ranganathan, qui a malencontreusement choisi un terme métaphorique du vocabulaire courant déjà chargé de sens, et dont la théorie des facettes est toujours restée ambiguë. L'auteur de cette étude en montre les inconsistances à partir du modèle linguistique des deux axes du langage, puis repère les grandes étapes de l'évolution qui a conduit les partisans des facettes du schéma analytico-synthétique de Ranganathan au schéma analytique du thésaurus à facettes. II plaide enfin pour un usage plus rigoureux du terme et de l'outil, qui fasse clairement le partage entre la classification des concepts et le classement des sujets.}, language = {fr}, number = {4/5}, journal = {Documentaliste}, author = {Maniez, Jacques}, year = {1999}, note = {OCLC: 192333398}, pages = {249--264}, } @article{mizzaro_relevance:_1997, title = {Relevance: {The} whole history}, volume = {48}, copyright = {Copyright © 1997 John Wiley \& Sons, Inc.}, issn = {1097-4571}, shorttitle = {Relevance}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4571%28199709%2948%3A9%3C810%3A%3AAID-ASI6%3E3.0.CO%3B2-U}, doi = {10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(199709)48:9<810::AID-ASI6>3.0.CO;2-U}, abstract = {Relevance is a fundamental, though not completely understood, concept for documentation, information science, and information retrieval. This article presents the history of relevance through an exhaustive review of the literature. Such history being very complex (about 160 papers are discussed), it is not simple to describe it in a comprehensible way. Thus, first of all a framework for establishing a common ground is defined, and then the history itself is illustrated via the presentation in chronological order of the papers on relevance. The history is divided into three periods (“Before 1958,” “1959–1976,” and “1977–present”) and, inside each period, the papers on relevance are analyzed under seven different aspects (methodological foundations, different kinds of relevance, beyond-topical criteria adopted by users, modes for expression of the relevance judgment, dynamic nature of relevance, types of document representation, and agreement among different judges). © 1997 John Wiley \& Sons, Inc.}, language = {en}, number = {9}, urldate = {2019-01-27}, journal = {Journal of the American Society for Information Science}, author = {Mizzaro, Stefano}, year = {1997}, pages = {810--832}, } @article{pirolli_information_1999, title = {Information foraging}, volume = {106}, copyright = {(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved}, issn = {1939-1471 0033-295X}, doi = {10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643}, abstract = {Information foraging theory is an approach to understanding how strategies and technologies for information seeking, gathering, and consumption are adapted to the flux of information in the environment. The theory assumes that people, when possible, will modify their strategies or the structure of the environment to maximize their rate of gaining valuable information. The theory is developed by (a) adaptation (rational) analysis of information foraging problems and (b) a detailed process model (adaptive control of thought in information foraging [ACT-IF]). The adaptation analysis develops (a) information patch models, which deal with time allocation and information filtering and enrichment activities in environments in which information is encountered in clusters; (b) information scent models, which address the identification of information value from proximal cues; and (c) information diet models, which address decisions about the selection and pursuit of information items. ACT-IF is instantiated as a production system model of people interacting with complex information technology.}, language = {en}, number = {4}, journal = {Psychological Review}, author = {Pirolli, Peter and Card, Stuart}, year = {1999}, pages = {643--675}, } @article{saracevic_study_1988, title = {A study of information seeking and retrieving. {II}. {Users}, questions, and effectiveness}, volume = {39}, copyright = {Copyright © 1988 John Wiley \& Sons, Inc.}, issn = {1097-4571}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4571%28198805%2939%3A3%3C177%3A%3AAID-ASI3%3E3.0.CO%3B2-F}, doi = {10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198805)39:3<177::AID-ASI3>3.0.CO;2-F}, abstract = {The objectives of the study were to conduct a series of observations and experiments under as real-life a situation as possible related to: (1) user context of questions in information retrieval; (2) the structure and classification of questions; (3) cognitive traits and decision making of searchers; and (4) different searches of the same question. The study is presented in three parts: Part I presents the background of the study and describes the models, measures, methods, procedures and statistical analyses used. Part II is devoted to results related to users, questions and effectiveness measures, and Part III to results related to searchers, searches and overlap studies. A concluding summary of all results is presented in Part III. © 1988 John Wiley \& Sons, Inc.}, language = {en}, number = {3}, urldate = {2019-01-21}, journal = {Journal of the American Society for Information Science}, author = {Saracevic, Tefko and Kantor, Paul}, year = {1988}, pages = {177--196}, } @article{saracevic_study_1988, title = {A study of information seeking and retrieving. {III}. {Searchers}, searches, and overlap}, volume = {39}, copyright = {Copyright © 1988 John Wiley \& Sons, Inc.}, issn = {1097-4571}, url = {https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/%28SICI%291097-4571%28198805%2939%3A3%3C197%3A%3AAID-ASI4%3E3.0.CO%3B2-A}, doi = {10.1002/(SICI)1097-4571(198805)39:3<197::AID-ASI4>3.0.CO;2-A}, abstract = {The objectives of the study were to conduct a series of observations and experiments under as real-life situation as possible related to: (1) user context of questions in information retrieval; (2) the structure and classification of questions; (3) cognitive traits and decision making of searchers; and (4) diferent searches of the same question. The study is presented in three parts: Part I presents the background of the study and describes the models, measures, methods, procedures and statistical analyses used. Part II is devoted to results related to users, questions and effectiveness measures, and Part III to results related to searchers, searches and overlap studies. A concluding summary of all results is presented in Part III. © 1988 John Wiley \& Sons, Inc.}, language = {en}, number = {3}, urldate = {2019-01-21}, journal = {Journal of the American Society for Information Science}, author = {Saracevic, Tefko and Kantor, Paul}, year = {1988}, pages = {197--216}, } @article{spiteri_simplified_1998, title = {A simplified model for facet analysis: {Ranganathan} 101}, volume = {23}, issn = {1195-096X}, language = {en}, number = {1-2}, journal = {Canadian journal of information and library science}, author = {Spiteri, Louise}, year = {1998}, pages = {1--30}, } @article{wilson_models_1999, title = {Models in information behaviour research}, volume = {55}, issn = {0022-0418}, doi = {10.1108/EUM0000000007145}, abstract = {This paper presents an outline of models of information seeking and other aspects of information behaviour, showing the relationship between communication and information behaviour in general with information seeking and information searching in information retrieval systems. It is suggested that these models address issues at various levels of information behaviour and that they can be related by envisaging a ‘nesting’ of models. It is also suggested that, within both information seeking research and information searching research, alternative models address similar issues in related ways and that the models are complementary rather than conflicting. Finally, an alternative, problem-solving model is presented, which, it is suggested, provides a basis for relating the models in appropriate research strategies.}, language = {en}, number = {3}, journal = {Journal of Documentation}, author = {Wilson, T. D.}, year = {1999}, pages = {249--270}, }